Skip to content
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT

NEWS & EVENTS

AW v WW (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 146

Nicholas Olson, led by Rashelle Seiden SC, successfully appeared for the defendant in AW v WW (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 146.

The appeal to the New South Wales Supreme Court concerned the meaning of the phrase ‘the question of law’ in clause 14(1)(b) of schedule 6, Part 6 to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).

The Court found that, in the context of the appeal, a ‘question of law’ means a pure question of law, not a mixed question of law and fact, and that the question posed in the amended summons was not a question of law.

A copy of the Court’s reasons for judgment can be found here.

CONTACT US

GET IN TOUCH

Ground Floor Wentworth Chambers

180 Phillip Street, SYDNEY, NSW 2000

TEL:+61 2 9230 3200

FAX: +61 2 9232 8435

LinkedIn

Copyright Ground Floor Wentworth Chambers

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation