Skip to content
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT US
  • BARRISTERS
  • CLERK
  • EXPERTISE
  • READERSHIP
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • CPD VIDEOS
  • CONTACT

NEWS & EVENTS

Ierna v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 592

Mark Robertson KC and Bradley Jones SC, instructed by Holding Redlich, successfully appeared for the applicant before the Federal Court of Australia in the recently decided Ierna v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 592.

The appeal concerned objection decisions made by the Commissioner of Taxation under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) in relation to a restructure effected by the applicants, which the Commissioner alleged resulted in payments which should have been treated either as dividends pursuant to s 45B of ITAA 1936 or as a tax benefit arising under a ‘scheme’ pursuant to Part IVA of ITAA 1936.

Justice Logan found that neither s 45B of ITAA 1936 or Part IVA of ITAA 1936 had any application as the dominant purpose of the restructure was to repay inter-group Division 7A loans, not to change the financial position of the creditor companies. His Honour allowed the appeal and ordered that the Commissioner’s objection decision be set aside.

A copy of the decision may be found here.

CONTACT US

GET IN TOUCH

Ground Floor Wentworth Chambers

180 Phillip Street, SYDNEY, NSW 2000

TEL:+61 2 9230 3200

FAX: +61 2 9232 8435

LinkedIn

Copyright Ground Floor Wentworth Chambers

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation